Their Turn - The Social Justice Movement of Our Time Their Turn - The Social Justice Movement of Our Time

HSUS’s Chimpanzee Debacle

April 6, 2021 by Leave a Comment

The News

In June 2020, I posted an article entitled “Why I’m Blowing the Whistle on HSUS” in order to raise awareness of the plight of chimpanzees at two sanctuaries run by the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) – Project Chimps in Georgia and Second Chance Chimpanzee Refuge in Liberia. Both are plagued by substandard facilities, deficient veterinary care and unqualified management. At Project Chimps, the residents are held in concrete rooms for all but about 10 hours a week because HSUS has not created enough enclosed yards on its “236-acre wooded habitat” to be able to provide the 77 chimps with daily access to the outdoors. Instead of acknowledging and fixing these serious, systemic problems, HSUS has used its PR machine to minimize them or deny that they exist. It has also used its lawyers to silence and intimidate those who speak out.

Precious, a chimpanzee at Project Chimps

In May 2020, HSUS inadvertently shined a national spotlight on Project Chimps by suing two women who came forward with credible and extensive evidence of animal neglect. Appalled that HSUS would sue whistleblowers (an intimidation tactic typically associated with big animal ag), animal advocates around the country, including several with expertise in captive primate care, stepped in to support the whistleblowers and amplify their calls for reform at Project Chimps.

Project Chimps, an HSUS sanctuary, sued former employees Crystal Alba and Linsday Vanderhoogt after they came forward publicly with evidence of animal cruelty

Despite not having visited Project Chimps, I believed the whistleblowers – not only because of the evidence they provided, but also because I saw the same problems during my two visits to HSUS’s chimp “sanctuary” in Liberia. There, HSUS is overseeing the care of over 60 ex-lab chimpanzees who the New York Blood Center (NYBC) moved to islands on a river when they no longer needed the chimps for experiments. Despite having received a $6 million check from NYBC in 2017 and hundreds of thousands of dollars in large and small donations from the public since 2015, HSUS has not built any desperately needed infrastructure on the islands.

National Geographic published an in-depth story that corroborated their allegations.

In October 2020, The Nonhuman Rights Project (NhRP), an organization of animal rights lawyers who represent captive chimpanzees and elephants, took the unusual step of issuing a public statement calling on HSUS to improve animal welfare at Project Chimps. NhRP was particularly distressed by the fact that Hercules and Leo, chimpanzees who they freed from a laboratory, did not have daily access to the outdoor habitat. HSUS dismissed their concerns, arguing that the concrete porches where they spend their days are outdoors.

HSUS claims that the 77 residents of Project Chimps have daily access to the outdoors, but advocates believe this is misleading because the “porches” are enclosed concrete rooms

The Nonhuman Rights Project issued a public statement demanding that Project Chimps provide its clients, Hercules and Leo, with daily access to the outdoors

On March 21st, NhRP marked the three year anniversary of Hercules’ and Leo’s arrival at Project Chimps by issuing another public statement, this time asking its global network of supporters to call on HSUS CEO Kitty Block to provide Hercules and Leo with daily access to the outdoors. NhRP and PETA, which also issued a statement, must have agonized about publicly criticizing another animal advocacy group, but, by repeatedly dismissing the concerns they raised in private, HSUS left them with no choice.

The Nonhuman Rights Project is asking its supporters to call on HSUS CEO Kitty Block to give the chimpanzees the choice to spend their days in the forested habitat

Primate community stakeholders (sanctuary directors, primatologists and veterinarians) are aware of the systemic failures at Project Chimps, but they have not spoken out publicly. That can be attributed to a desire to avoid infighting or, more likely, to a fear of retaliation. HSUS is well known in the animal advocacy community for using its resources to intimidate and silence its critics. It used its lawyers at Seyfarth Shaw LLP, a global law firm with 12 offices in the U.S., to represent Project Chimps in its lawsuit against the whistleblowers. (HSUS ultimately dropped the suit, but not before the whistleblowers spent $30,000 on legal fees, a very large sum for young people earning a modest sanctuary salary.)

Fear of retaliation also helps to explain why former Project Chimps employees, who bonded with the chimpanzees, have been silent for the last year. Their fear of violating their termination agreements, however, could be outweighed by their desire to help the chimps.

The Nonhuman Rights Project is calling on The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) to provide its clients, Hercules and Leo, with daily access to an outdoor yard.

A conflict of interest could also explain why stakeholders in the primate sanctuary community have been silent. Many receive monetary and/or non-monetary support from HSUS that they cannot afford to turn down.

Since writing my first article about the plight of the chimps in HSUS’s care, advocates have asked me why HSUS, an organization whose mission is to protect animals, is failing the animals in their own care. I can only surmise, based on my experience at its chimpanzee sanctuary in Liberia, that HSUS doesn’t want to spend the money to transform Project Chimps into a real sanctuary. This frugality is inexcusable not only because of HSUS’s considerable wealth, but also because the organization has raised millions of dollars off of the plight of captive chimps.

The 77 chimpanzees at Project Chimps have access to an outdoor habitat for approximately 10 hours per week. They spend the remainder of their days in concrete porches that HSUS and Project Chimps describe as “outdoors”

Over the past several months, outside inspections that revealed serious deficiencies have left HSUS with no choice but to publicly acknowledge problems at Project Chimps in Georgia, but the organization has downplayed the problems as minor. If HSUS were to acknowledge the seriousness of the problems, then it would be forced to make the necessary investments and to acknowledge that the whistleblowers who they sued were right all along.

Continued public pressure will ultimately compel HSUS to fix the systemic failures at Project Chimps, but shouldn’t HSUS have wanted to live up to its promise to provide a “great home for retired chimpanzees” in the first place?

Progress For Science, a Los Angeles-based animal rights group,  protests at the Santa Monica home The Humane Society of the United States board member Steven White over the mistreatment of animals at its Project Chimps sanctuary

In order for HSUS to uphold the mission of Project Chimps “to provide lifelong exemplary care” to the chimpanzees in its care, it must do the following:
  1. Begin constructing additional yards on its 236 acre forested property so that the chimps have access to the outdoors every day instead of every third day.
  2. Rotate two groups of chimps (instead of one) into each of the two yards every day (one group in the morning, and the other in the afternoon) so that the chimps have access to the outdoors between 4 and 5 times each week.
  3. Hire an Executive Director who has chimpanzee experience; who instinctively prioritizes the welfare of the animals and who has the respect of his or her peers in the primate sanctuary community.
  4. Hire a veterinarian and vet tech who have chimpanzee expertise.
  5. Appoint two people to Board of Directors of Project Chimps who have captive chimpanzee experience and are willing and able to function independently from HSUS.

Comments via Facebook Comments

  1. Donny Moss says:

    Reia: This letter contains a lot of misinformation. The Nonhuman Rights Project, PETA, grass roots animal advocacy groups, independent activists and 24 former employees/volunteers wouldn’t be speaking out if the chimpanzees at Project Chimps were being treated humanely. The fact that chimps have access to the outdoors just once every three days for a few hours is, in and of itself, a major animal welfare problem. Unfortunately, it’s one of many. In this post, I explain why I decided to advocate on behalf of these chimpanzees.

  2. Dave and Rita Cross says:

    We have donated to USHS for many years! After learning of the neglect, we will suspend all donations until USHS places a priority on the welfare of animals!!

  3. joan silaco says:

    HSUS use to be good at Washington legislature. And I told them that they stink at running sanctuaries, and should stick to the paperwork of politics! They were ready to dispose of CLEVELAND AMORY’S BLACK BEAUTY RANCH, but now I see that they are still running it. So who know’s with them! Actually, I have a page from their magazine [?] telling saying how it’s a tourist attraction to go to the project chimps place. Now I can send it to the powers that be and ask them if they will still give me a tour as they say they have.

  4. Kathi Proper says:

    I have read articles before about the lack of care given to animals supposedly
    being cared for by HSUS. I stopped donating to their causes years ago.
    Why aren’t these large corporations relegated?

  5. Donny says:

    @Larry – Project Chimps stated that the vet was going out on “medical leave” (which would suggest she was going to come back), but, in the same statement, they said they were looking for a full time replacement. A few days later, they changed the statement to say that she left due to a family emergency. Now, the chimps are stuck with the same dog and cat vet who, for months, ignored serious symptoms in spite of pleas from chimp caregivers. A couple of these chimps have died.

  6. Larry Trepel says:

    Any known reason why the new vet left so quickly?

  7. Debbie Babb says:

    All animals lives matter! Please protect and save these chimps!

  8. Joan says:

    Mr Johnson is correct. Dan Paul is anti-wildlife and has no business on any board/committee or in any organization where the welfare of an animal is at stake. HSUS doesn’t seem to care anymore, unless it’s about getting your donation. This situation with the chimps is appalling and they will not see a donation from me again.

  9. Caliboy says:

    I agree completely. HSUS hasn’t been an animal rights organization ever, that I’m aware of. They certainly aren’t humane and so should have to change their name. But, this is the U S A and so that’s never going happen. It’s all about $$$$$ ! Remember “Hoofin’ It” ? They burned the flesh of the innocent to stuff even more $$$$$ in their bank accounts!!! This is an evil organization.

  10. Wayne Johnson PhD says:

    An excellent example of HSUS being complicit in abusive practices,is in Washington state. Their official representative, Dan Paul is a member of the WAG (Wolf Advisory Group)For years he has joined the consensus which has made a decision to kill whole packs of wolves in Northeast Washington.

  11. John J Pippin says:

    I hope a GoFundMe campaign was launched to compensate the two whistleblowers who had to pay $30K court costs.

  12. Murry Cohen says:

    Every individual animal advocate, and every animal advocacy group should cooperate together and force HSUS to fix this situation. With all their millions of dollars, and with the salary they pay their leaders, they should be easily able to do this. HSUS, which has gobbled up smaller animal advocacy groups, has become too large, and has elected to follow the route of other large and abusive corporations.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *